- Constitutional Law Of India Dr J N Pandey Pdf
- Constitutional Law Of India By J N Pandey Pdf Online
- Constitutional Law Of India By J N Pandey Pdf Download
- Constitutional Law Of India Dr. J.n. Pandey Central Law Agency Pdf
- Constitutional Law Of India By J N Pandey Pdf Free
- Constitutional Law Of India By J N Pandey Pdf 2017
- Constitutional Law Of India By Jn Pandey Pdf Free Download
fullpacrf.netlify.com › Constitutional Law Of India By J N Pandey Pdf Writer █
And Constitution of India on a 2015 postage stamp of IndiaIt was adopted by the on 26 November 1949 and became effective on 26 January 1950. The constitution replaced the as the country's fundamental governing document, and the became the Republic of India. To ensure, its framers repealed prior acts of the in Article 395.
India celebrates its constitution on 26 January as.The constitution declares India a, assuring its citizens, and, and endeavours to promote. The original 1950 constitution is preserved in a -filled case at the in. The words 'secular' and 'socialist' were added to the preamble in 1976 during the. Chairman of the drafting committee, presenting the final draft of the Indian constitution to Constituent Assembly president on 25 November 1949Most of the was under from 1857 to 1947. From 1947 to 1950, the same legislation continued to be implemented as India was a of Britain for these three years, as each princely state was convinced by and to sign the with India, and the British government continued to be responsible for the external security of the country. Thus, the constitution of India repealed the and when it became effective on 26 January 1950. India ceased to be a of the and became a sovereign democratic republic with the constitution.
Articles 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 60, 324, 366, 367, 379, 380, 388, 391, 392, 393, and 394 of the constitution came into force on 26 November 1949, and the remaining articles became effective on 26 January 1950. Previous legislationThe constitution was drawn from a number of sources. Mindful of India's needs and conditions, its framers borrowed features of previous legislation such as the, the, and, the and, and the. The latter, which led to the creation of India and Pakistan, divided the former Constituent Assembly in two.
The book is a mistake for better understanding of the Constitutional law of India as it precisely explains each and every article and makes it easy to understand and remember. I will highly recommend this book to law students. The only defect is that I received slightly damaged book and expect better next time.
- Recent View: constitutional law of india by j n pandey pdf; soal soal constitutional law of india by jn pandey pdf pdf; resveratrol pada kulit buah anggur merah untuk terapi hpertensi pdf. In this, the Indian Constitution has gone a step forward than the Bill of Rights incorporated in the Constitution of the U. Safeguards against arbitrary.
- Like the previous edition, this edition of Late Dr. Jai Narain Pandey's Constitutional Law of India, a classic for the law students and competitive examinees is expected to be received warmly by them as well as by the faculty. Some of the cases decided by the Supreme court of vital constitutional importance are worth to be mentioned here.
Each new assembly had sovereign power to draft and enact a new constitution for the separate states. Constituent Assembly. Main article:The constitution was drafted by the, which was elected by elected members of the. The 389-member assembly (reduced to 299 after the ) took almost three years to draft the constitution holding eleven sessions over a 165-day period.was a wise constitutional expert, he had studied the constitutions of about 60 countries. Ambedkar is recognised as the 'Father of the Constitution of India'.
In the constitution assembly, a member of the drafting committee, said:'Mr. President, Sir, I am one of those in the House who have listened to very carefully. I am aware of the amount of work and enthusiasm that he has brought to bear on the work of drafting this Constitution. At the same time, I do realise that that amount of attention that was necessary for the purpose of drafting a constitution so important to us at this moment has not been given to it by the Drafting Committee. The House is perhaps aware that of the seven members nominated by you, one had resigned from the House and was replaced. One died and was not replaced. One was away in America and his place was not filled up and another person was engaged in State affairs, and there was a void to that extent.
One or two people were far away from Delhi and perhaps reasons of health did not permit them to attend. So it happened ultimately that the burden of drafting this constitution fell on Dr. Ambedkar and I have no doubt that we are grateful to him for having achieved this task in a manner which is undoubtedly commendable.' Timeline of formation of the Constitution of India. 6 December 1946: Formation of the Constitution Assembly (in accordance with French practice). 9 December 1946: The first meeting was held in the constitution hall (now the ).
The 1st person to address was, became temporary president. (Demanding a separate state, the Muslim League boycotted the meeting.). 11 December 1946: The Assembly appointed as its president, as its vice-chairman and as constitutional legal adviser.
(There were initially 389 members in total, which declined to 299 after. Out of the 389 members, 292 were from government provinces, 4 from chief commissioner provinces and 93 from princely states.).
13 December 1946: An 'Objective Resolution' was presented by, laying down the underlying principles of the constitution. This later became the Preamble of the Constitution. 22 January 1947: Objective resolution unanimously adopted.
22 July 1947: adopted. 15 August 1947: Achieved independence. India split into the and the.
29 August 1947: Drafting Committee appointed with as its Chairman. The other 6 members of committee were Munshi, Khaitan and Mitter.
16 July 1948: Along with, was also elected as second vice-president of Constituent Assembly. 26 November 1949: The Constitution of India was passed and adopted by the assembly. 24 January 1950: Last meeting of Constituent Assembly.
The Constitution was signed and accepted. (with 395 Articles, 8 Schedules, 22 Parts). 26 January 1950: The Constitution came into force. (The process took 2 years, 11 months and 18 days - at a total expenditure of ₹6.4 million to finish.)was the first of the (the lower house of Parliament) after India turned into a republic.Membership, Sanjay Phakey, Sandipkumar Patel, and were key figures in the assembly, which had over 30 representatives of the. Represented the, and the were represented by H.
Modi., a Christian assembly vice-president, chaired the minorities committee and represented non-Anglo-Indian Christians. Ari Bahadur Gurung represented the Gorkha community. Judges, such as, and were members of the assembly. Female members included, and.The first, two-day president of the assembly was; was later elected president. It met for the first time on 9 December 1946. (1887-1953) was a statesman, diplomat, Indian civil servant, jurist known for his key role in drafting Constitution of India.Sir, a who became the first in the and was, was appointed as the assembly's constitutional adviser in 1946.
Responsible for the constitution's general structure, Rau prepared its initial draft in February 1948. The draft of B.N. Rau consisted of 243 articles and 13 schedules which came to 395 articles and 8 schedules after discussions, debates and amendments.At 14 August 1947 meeting of the assembly, committees were proposed. Rau's draft was considered, debated and amended by the eight-person drafting committee, which was appointed on 29 August 1947 with as chair. A revised draft constitution was prepared by the committee and submitted to the assembly on 4 November 1947. Dr in his concluding speech in constituent assembly on November 25, 1949 stated that:The credit that is given to me does not really belong to me. It belongs partly to Sir B.N.
Rau the Constitutional Advisor to the Constituent Assembly who prepared a rough draft of the Constitution for the consideration of Drafting Committee.While deliberating the revised draft constitution, the assembly moved, discussed and disposed off 2,473 amendments out of a total of 7,635. Before adopting the constitution, the assembly held eleven sessions in 165 days. On 26 November 1949 it adopted the constitution, which was signed by 284 members.
The day is celebrated as National Law Day,. The day was chosen to spread the importance of the constitution and to spread thoughts and ideas of Ambedkar. Signing the constitutionThe assembly's final session convened on 24 January 1950. Each member signed two copies of the constitution, one in and the other in English. The original constitution is hand-written, with each page decorated by artists from including. Its was Prem Behari Narain Raizada.
The constitution was published in and by the. Production of the original constitution took nearly five years. Two days later, on 26 January 1950, it became the law of. The estimated cost of the Constituent Assembly was ₹6.3 ( ₹63 million).
The constitution has had since it was enacted. See also: AmendmentsAmendments are additions, variations or repeal of any part of the constitution by Parliament. The procedure is detailed in. An amendment bill must be passed by each house of Parliament by a two-thirds majority of its total membership when at least two-thirds are present and vote. Certain amendments pertaining to the constitution's federal nature must also be ratified by a majority of state legislatures. Unlike ordinary bills in accordance with (except for ), there is no provision for a joint session of the and to pass a constitutional amendment.
During a parliamentary recess, the president cannot promulgate under his legislative powers under. Which can be passed under the legislative powers of parliament were invalidated by in the.By July 2018, 124 amendment bills had been presented in Parliament; of these, 103 became Amendment Acts. Despite the requirement for amendments to pass, the Indian constitution is the world's most frequently-amended national governing document. The constitution is so specific in spelling out government powers that many amendments address issues dealt with by statute in other democracies.In 2000, the was formed to examine a constitutional update. The establishes term-based to recommend legal reforms, facilitating the rule of law.Limitations. Main article:In, the ruled that an amendment cannot destroy what it seeks to modify; it cannot tinker with the constitution's basic structure or framework, which are immutable.
Such an amendment will be declared invalid, although no part of the constitution is protected from amendment; the basic structure doctrine does not protect any one provision of the constitution. According to the doctrine, the constitution's basic features (when 'read as a whole') cannot be abridged or abolished. These 'basic features' have not been fully defined, and whether a particular provision of the constitution is a 'basic feature' is decided by the courts.The Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala decision laid down the constitution's basic structure:. Supremacy of the constitution.
Republican, democratic form of government. Its secular nature. Separation of powers. Its federal characterThis implies that Parliament can only amend the constitution to the limit of its basic structure. The Supreme Court or a may declare the amendment null and void if this is violated, after a.
This is typical of parliamentary governments, where the judiciary checks parliamentary power.In its 1967 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Punjab could not restrict any fundamental rights protected by the basic structure doctrine. The extent of land ownership and practice of a profession, in this case, were considered fundamental rights. The ruling was overturned with the ratification of the 24th Amendment in 1971. Constitution and judiciaryThe judiciary is the final arbiter of the constitution.
Its duty (mandated by the constitution) is to act as a watchdog, preventing any legislative or executive act from overstepping constitutional bounds. The judiciary protects the fundamental rights of the people (enshrined in the constitution) from infringement by any state body, and balances the conflicting exercise of power between the central government and a state (or states).The courts are expected to remain unaffected by pressure exerted by other branches of the state, citizens or interest groups. An independent judiciary has been held as a basic feature of the constitution, which cannot be changed by the legislature or the executive. Judicial reviewwas adopted by the constitution of India from. In the Indian constitution, is dealt with in. The constitution is the supreme power of the nation, and governs all laws. According to Article 13,.
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
All pre-constitutional laws, if they conflict wholly or in part with the constitution, shall have all conflicting provisions deemed ineffective until an amendment to the constitution ends the conflict; the law will again come into force if it is compatible with the constitution as amended (the Doctrine of Eclipse). Laws made after the adoption of the constitution must be compatible with it, or they will be deemed void. In such situations, the Supreme Court (or a high court) determines if a law is in conformity with the constitution.
If such an interpretation is not possible because of inconsistency (and where separation is possible), the provision which is inconsistent with the constitution is considered void. In addition to Article 13, Articles 32, 226 and 227 provide the constitutional basis for judicial review.Due to the adoption of the, the Supreme Court was not allowed to preside over any laws adopted during a state of emergency which infringe under article 32 (the right to constitutional remedies). The widened Article 31C and added Articles 368(4) and 368(5), stating that any law passed by Parliament could not be challenged in court. The Supreme Court ruled in that judicial review is a basic characteristic of the constitution, overturning Articles 368(4), 368(5) and 31C. FlexibilityAccording to, 'The Indian constitution is first and foremost a social document, and is aided by its Parts III & IV (Fundamental Rights & Directive Principles of State Policy, respectively) acting together, as its chief instruments and its conscience, in realising the goals set by it for all the people.' The constitution has deliberately been worded in generalities (not in vague terms) to ensure its flexibility., the fourth, said that a constitution's 'great outlines should be marked, its important objects designated, and the minor ingredients which compose those objects be deduced from the nature of the objects themselves.'
. Wangchuk, Rinchen Norbu (22 January 2019). Retrieved 22 January 2019. Wangchuk, Rinchen Norbu (22 January 2019).
Retrieved 22 January 2019. New Delhi: Government of India.
26 November 1949. From the original on 22 March 2019. Retrieved 22 March 2019. (PDF). Government of India. (PDF) from the original on 31 March 2015. Retrieved 5 February 2015.
^ Krithika, R. (21 January 2016). From the original on 21 December 2016. Retrieved 24 July 2018. ^ Pylee, Moolamattom Varkey (1994).
India's Constitution (5th rev. Chand & Company. P. 3. ^ Nix, Elizabeth (9 August 2016).
From the original on 24 July 2018. Retrieved 24 July 2018. Archived from on 2 April 2015. (PDF). Archived from (PDF) on 8 December 2015. Retrieved 12 October 2015.
Ministry of Law and Justice of India. 29 July 2008. From the original on 22 October 2014. Retrieved 14 October 2008. Swaminathan, Shivprasad (26 January 2013). The Hindu: Opinion. From the original on 1 March 2013.
Retrieved 18 February 2013. Das, Hari (2002). Political System of India (Reprint ed.).: Anmol Publications.
P. 120. WP(Civil) No.
98/2002 (12 September 2002). Supreme Court of India. (PDF) from the original on 7 May 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2015. (PDF). Ministry of Law & Justice.
Archived from (PDF) on 9 October 2017. Retrieved 29 March 2012. ^ Dhavan, Rajeev (26 November 2015). From the original on 24 July 2018.
Retrieved 24 July 2018. Imo for mac. Menon, V.P. (15 September 1955). The story of the integration of the India states.
Bangalore: Longman Greens and Co. From the original on 20 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015. ^ Yellosa, Jetling (26 November 2015). From the original on 24 July 2018. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
^. The Parliament of India Archive. Archived from on 29 September 2007.
![Pandey Pandey](https://image.isu.pub/181010125556-348b4430ab9b659ccd3c59c13f5bbee5/jpg/page_1.jpg)
Retrieved 22 February 2008. Laxmikanth, M. McGraw-Hill Education. Retrieved 6 April 2019 – via Google Books. DelhiNovember 26, India Today Web Desk New; November 26, 2018UPDATED; Ist, 2018 15:31.
From the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 6 April 2019.
14 June 2016. From the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 6 April 2019. From the original on 7 January 2019. Retrieved 6 April 2019.
^ Patnaik, Biswaraj (26 January 2017).:. From the original on 24 July 2018. Retrieved 24 July 2018. Archived from on 20 February 2012. Retrieved 13 June 2013. CS1 maint: archived copy as title.
^. Internet Desk. 26 November 2015. From the original on 27 June 2019. Retrieved 26 July 2018.
CS1 maint: others. (PDF). (PDF). Archived from on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 12 May 2014. CS1 maint: archived copy as title. ^.
Parliament of India. National Informatics Centre. Archived from on 11 May 2011.
Retrieved 14 April 2011. On 29 August 1947, the Constituent Assembly set up a Drafting Committee under the Chairmanship of B. Ambedkar to prepare a Draft Constitution for India. 30 November 2015 at the, Firstpost, 26 November 2011.
27 November 2015 at the, DNA India, 26 November 2015. 12 October 2015. From the original on 14 November 2015. Retrieved 20 November 2015. From the original on 17 April 2014.
Retrieved 17 April 2014. India Code Information System. Ministry of Law, Government of India. From the original on 27 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2013. (27 November 2015).
From the original on 24 July 2018. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
Sridhar, Madabhushi. Dr.Marri Channa Reddy Human Resource Development Institute (Institute of Administration), Hyderabad. Archived from (PDF) on 16 June 2015. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
Lockette, Tim (18 November 2012). Josephine Ayers. From the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 24 July 2018. Archived from on 25 March 2016. Retrieved 4 July 2010.
(PDF). (PDF) from the original on 17 January 2019. Retrieved 16 January 2019. Baruah, Aparijita (2007).
New Delhi: Deep & Deep. Retrieved 12 November 2015. Chishti, Seema; Anand, Utkarsh (30 January 2015). The Indian Express. From the original on 27 October 2015. Retrieved 12 November 2015. Ministry of Law and Justice of India.
28 August 1976. From the original on 28 March 2015. Retrieved 14 October 2008. (PDF). (PDF) from the original on 22 May 2012. Retrieved 17 November 2013.
CS1 maint: archived copy as title. ^ Menon, N.R. Madhava (26 September 2004). Retrieved 21 November 2015. M Laxmikanth (2013).
Indian Polity (4th ed.). McGraw Hill Education. P. 3.2. Krishnakumar, R. Frontline (Vol.
14:: 4–17 July 1998). From the original on 30 March 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2015. Rajendra Prasad, R.J.
Frontline (Vol. 14:: 4–17 July 1998). Retrieved 9 November 2015.
Swami, Praveen. Frontline (Vol. 22:: 1–14 Nov. From the original on 19 February 2014.
Retrieved 9 November 2015. ^.
From the original on 26 August 2014. Retrieved 23 August 2014.
name='amendments'. Krishnamurthi, Vivek (2009). Archived from (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Dhamija, Dr. Ashok (2007). Wadhwa and Company.
Retrieved 17 June 2014. ^ aDvantage. From the original on 21 March 2016. Retrieved 26 January 2016. Jacobsohn, Gary J. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
P. 52. ^ Dalal, Milan (2008). Boston College International Comparative Law Review. 31 (2): 258–260.
From the original on 18 October 2015. Retrieved 5 March 2015. Mehta, Pratap Bhanu (2002).
Hasan, Zoya; Sridharan, E.; Sudarshan, R. Microsoft paint online. ((2006)Second Impression (2002)First ed.). Delhi: Permanent Black. Retrieved 9 November 2015.
Bhattacharyya, Bishwajit. The day after (1–15 Nov 2015). Archived from on 5 May 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2015. National Comionmission to Review the Working of the Constitution. New Delhi (26 September 2001).
Constitutional Law Of India Dr J N Pandey Pdf
Archived from on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 5 November 2015. Chakrabarty, Bidyut (2008).
Oxon(UK), New York (USA): Routledge. Retrieved 5 November 2015. Sorabjee, Soli J. Aoc e1649fwu driver windows 10. (1 November 2015). From the original on 13 November 2015. Retrieved 12 November 2015.
Venkatesan, V. (10–23 March 2012). Vol. 29 no. 05.
From the original on 13 June 2014. Retrieved 26 July 2018. Jain, Mahabir Prashad (2010). Indian Constitutional Law (6th ed.).: LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa Nagpur. P. 921. Lectures By Professor Parmanad Singh, Jindal Global Law School.
Jacobsohn, Gary (2010). Constitutional Identity.:. P. 57. Chandrachud, Chintan (6 June 2015). From the original on 25 June 2018.
Retrieved 26 July 2018. Raghavan, Vikram (2010).
From the original on 19 September 2015. Retrieved 13 November 2015. Dharmadhikari, Justice D. (2004) 4 SCC (Jour) 1. From the original on 28 January 2016.
Retrieved 6 November 2015., 17 U.S. (4 Wheaton) 316, 407 ( 1819)., 17 U.S. (4 Wheaton) 316, 415 ( 1819). Gaur, K. New Delhi: Deep & Deep. Erdas imagine version 9.1 download. Retrieved 9 November 2015. Narain, Vrinda.
Vermont Law Review. Retrieved 9 November 2015. Khosla, Madhav (2011). International Journal of Constitutional Law. 8 (4): 761.:.
Retrieved 10 November 2015. Making of India's constitution (2nd ed.).: Eastern Book Co (published 1 January 2008).Bibliography. (2015).
Making of India's Constitution (2nd Edition 2008, (Reprinted 2015) ed.). Eastern Book Company. (1999).
The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. (2003). Working a Democratic Constitution: A History of the Indian Experience (2nd ed.).
Oxford University Press. Baruah, Aparajita (2007). Preamble of the Constitution of India: An Insight & Comparison. Eastern Book Co. Basu, Durga Das (1965). Commentary on the constitution of India: (being a comparative treatise on the universal principles of justice and constitutional government with special reference to the organic instrument of India). Sarkar & Sons (Private) Ltd.
Basu, Durga Das (1984). Introduction to the Constitution of India (10th ed.). South Asia Books. Basu, Durga Das (1981). Shorter Constitution of India.
Prentice-Hall of India. Das, Hari Hara (2002). Political System of India.
Anmol Publications. Dash, Shreeram Chandra (1968). The Constitution of India; a Comparative Study. Chaitanya Pub. House.
Dhamija, Dr. Ashok (2007). Need to Amend a Constitution and Doctrine of Basic Features. Wadhwa and Company. Ghosh, Pratap Kumar (1966). The Constitution of India: How it Has Been Framed. World Press.
Jayapalan, N. Constitutional History of India. Atlantic Publishers & Distributors. (1981). Making of India's Constitution. Eastern Book Co. Rahulrai, Durga Das (1984).
Introduction to the Constitution of India (10th ed.). South Asia Books. Pylee, M.V. India's Constitution. Chand & Co.
Pylee, M.V. Constitutional Government in India. Chand & Co.
Sen, Sarbani (2007). The Constitution of India: Popular Sovereignty and Democratic Transformations. Oxford University Press.
Sharma, Dinesh; Singh, Jaya; Maganathan, R.; et al. Indian Constitution at Work.
Political Science, Class XI. The Parliament of India Archive. Archived from on 29 September 2007. Retrieved 22 February 2008.External links.
Contents.History The law in the current form finds its root in the Hate Speech Law Section 295(A) enacted by the British Administration in India. This act was brought about in the backdrop of a series of murders of leaders who polemicized against Islam. This started in 1897 with the murder of by a Muslim because he had written a book criticizing Islam. Argues that 'Section 295A was not instituted by Hindu society, but against it. It was imposed by the British on the Hindus in order to shield Islam from criticism'.
Main article:In a landmark judgment of the case Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that the freedom of speech and expression has no geographical limitation and it carries with it the right of a citizen to gather information and to exchange thought with others not only in India but abroad also.The constitution of India does not specifically mention the freedom of press. Freedom of press is implied from the Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. Thus the press is subject to the restrictions that are provided under the Article 19(2) of the Constitution. Before Independence, there was no constitutional or statutory provision to protect the freedom of press. As observed by the Privy Council in Channing Arnold v. King Emperor: 'The freedom of the journalist is an ordinary part of the freedom of the subject and to whatever length, the subject in general may go, so also may the journalist, but apart from statute his privilege is no other and no higher.
Constitutional Law Of India By J N Pandey Pdf Writers
The range of his assertions, his criticisms or his comments is as wide as, and no wider than that of any other subject'. The Preamble of the Indian Constitution ensures to all its citizens the liberty of expression. Has been included as part of freedom of speech and expression under the Article 19 of the UDHR. The heart of the Article 19 says: 'Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression, this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.'
State of Madras, Patanjali Shastri, observed: 'Freedom of speech and of the press lay at the foundation of all democratic organisations, for without free political discussion no public education, so essential for the proper functioning of the process of popular government, is possible.' The Supreme Court observed in Union of India v. For Democratic Reforms: 'Onesided information, disinformation, misinformation and non-information, all equally create an uninformed citizenry which makes democracy a farce. Freedom of speech and expression includes right to impart and receive information which includes freedom to hold opinions'.In Indian Express v. Union of India, it has been held that the press plays a very significant role in the democratic machinery. The courts have duty to uphold the freedom of press and invalidate all laws and administrative actions that abridge that freedom. Freedom of press has three essential elements.
They are:. freedom of access to all sources of information,. freedom of publication, and. freedom of circulation.In India, the press has not been able to practise its freedom to express the popular views. In Sakal Papers Ltd. Union of India, the Daily Newspapers (Price and Page) Order, 1960, which fixed the number of pages and size which a newspaper could publish at a price was held to be violative of freedom of press and not a reasonable restriction under the Article 19(2). Similarly, in Bennett Coleman and Co.
Union of India, the validity of the Newsprint Control Order, which fixed the maximum number of pages, was struck down by the Supreme Court of India holding it to be violative of provision of Article 19(1)(a) and not to be reasonable restriction under Article 19(2). The Court struck down the rebuttal of the Government that it would help small newspapers to grow.In Romesh Thapar v. State of Madras (1950 SCR 594, 607; AIR 1950 SC 124), entry and circulation of the English journal 'Cross Road', printed and published in Bombay, was banned by the Government of Madras. The same was held to be violative of the freedom ofspeech and expression, as 'without liberty of circulation, publication would be of little value'. In Prabha Dutt v. Union of India ((1982) 1 SCC 1; AIR 1982 SC 6.), the Supreme Court directed the Superintendent of Tihar Jail to allow representatives of a few newspapers to interview Ranga and Billa, the death sentence convicts, as they wanted to be interviewed.There are instances when the freedom of press has been suppressed by the legislature. The authority of the government, in such circumstances, has been under the scanner of judiciary.
In the case of Brij Bhushan v. State of Delhi (AIR 1950 SC 129), the validity of censorship previous to the publication of an English Weekly of Delhi, the Organiser was questioned. The court struck down the Section 7 of the East Punjab Safety Act, 1949, which directed the editor and publisher of a newspaper 'to submit for scrutiny, in duplicate, before the publication, till the further orders, all communal matters all the matters and news and views about Pakistan, including photographs, and cartoons', on the ground that it was a restriction on the liberty of the press.
Similarly, prohibiting newspaper from publishing its own views or views of correspondents about a topic has been held to be a serious encroachment on the freedom of speech and expression. Restrictions. Main article:Under Indian law, the freedom of speech and of the press do not confer an absolute right to express one's thoughts freely. Clause (2) of Article 19 of the Indian constitution enables the legislature to impose certain restrictions on free speech under following heads:. I.
Security of the State,. II. Friendly relations with foreign States,. III. Public order,. IV. Decency and morality,.
V. Contempt of court,. VI. Defamation,. VII. Incitement to an offence, and.
VIII. Sovereignty and integrity of India.Reasonable restrictions on these grounds can be imposed only by a duly enacted law and not by executive action.Security of the State: Reasonable restrictions can be imposed on the freedom of speech and expression, in the interest of the security of the State. All the utterances intended to endanger the security of the State by crimes of violence intended to overthrow the government, waging of war and rebellion against the government, external aggression or war, etc., may be restrained in the interest of the security of the State.
It does not refer to the ordinary breaches of public orderwhich do not involve any danger to the State.Friendly relations with foreign States: This ground was added by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act of 1951. The State can impose reasonable restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression, if it tends to jeopardise the friendly relations of India with other State.Public order: This ground was added by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951 in order to meet the situation arising from the Supreme Court's decision in Romesh Thapar's case (AIR 1950 SC 124). The expression 'public order' connotes the sense of public peace, safety and tranquillity.In Kishori Mohan v. State of West Bengal, the Supreme Court explained the differences between three concepts: law and order, public order, security of State. Anything that disturbs public peace or public tranquillity disturbs public order. But mere criticism of the government does not necessarily disturb public order. A law punishing the utterances deliberately tending to hurt the religious feelings of any class has been held to be valid as it is a reasonable restriction aimed to maintaining the public order.It is also necessary that there must be a reasonable nexus between the restriction imposed and the achievement of public order.
In Superintendent, Central Prison v. Ram Manohar Lohiya (AIR 1960 SC 633), the Court held the Section 3 of U.P. Special Powers Act, 1932, which punished a person if he incited a single person not to pay or defer the payment of Government dues, as there was no reasonable nexus between the speech and public order. Similarly, the court upheld the validity of the provision empowering a Magistrate to issue directions to protect the public order or tranquillity.Decency and morality: The word 'obscenity' is identical with the word 'indecency' of the Indian Constitution. In an English case of R. Hicklin, the test was laid down according to which it is seen 'whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscene tend to deprave and corrupt the minds which are open to such immoral influences'.
This test was upheld by the Supreme Court in Ranjit D. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1965 SC 881). In this case the Court upheld the conviction of a book seller who was prosecuted under Section 292, I.P.C., for selling and keeping the book Lady Chatterley's Lover. The standard of morality varies from time to time and from place to place.Contempt of court: The constitutional right to freedom of speech would not allow a person to contempt the courts. The expression Contempt of Court has been defined Section 2 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The term contempt of court refers to civil contempt or criminal contempt under the Act.
But judges do not have any general immunity from criticism of their judicial conduct, provided that it is made in good faith and is genuine criticism, and not any attempt to impair the administration of justice. In In re Arundhati Roy ((2002) 3 SCC 343), the Supreme Court of India followed the view taken in the American Supreme Court (Frankfurter, J.) in Pennekamp v.
Florida (328 US 331: 90 L Ed 1295 (1946)) in which the United States Supreme Court observed: 'If men, including judges and journalists, were angels, there would be no problem of contempt of court. Angelic judges would be undisturbed by extraneous influences and angelic journalists would not seek to influence them. The power to punish for contempt, as a means of safeguarding judges in deciding on behalf of the community as impartially as is given to the lot of men to decide, is not a privilege accorded to judges.
Constitutional Law Of India By J N Pandey Pdf Online
The power to punish for contempt of court is a safeguard not for judges as persons but for the function which they exercise'. Namboodripad v. Nambiar ((1970) 2 SCC 325; AIR 1970 SC 2015), the Supreme Court confirmed the decision of the High Court, holding Mr. Namboodripad guilty of contempt of court.
Farooq Abdullah ((1984) 2 SCC 343; AIR 1984 SC 615.), contempt proceedings were initiated against the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir. But the Court dismissed the petition for want of proof.Defamation: The clause (2) of Article 19 prevents any person from making any statement that injures the reputation of another. With the same view, defamation has been criminalised in India by inserting it into Section 499 of the I.P.C. Where defamation is concerned, in case of a criminal defamation suit as laid down in Sections 499 and Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code, the issue - in question - being the truth isn’t considered a defence. Even if a person has spoken the truth, he can be prosecuted for defamation. Under the first exception to Section 499, truth will only be a defence if the statement was made ‘for the public good.’ And that, is a question of fact to be assessed by the judiciary.
Constitutional Law Of India By J N Pandey Pdf Download
The erstwhile Economic & Political Weekly (EPW) Editor Paranjoy Guha Thakurta’s resignation following a legal notice by the lawyers for Adani Power Limited (APL) to the owners – the trustees of Sameeksha Trust, which owns and runs the Journal, Editor and authors of an article later withdrawn for 'failing to meet editorial standards,' brought the reach of IPC's Section 499 back into limelight.Incitement to an offense: This ground was also added by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951. The Constitution also prohibits a person from making any statement that incites people to commit offense.Sovereignty and integrity of India: This ground was also added subsequently by the Constitution (Sixteenth Amendment) Act, 1963. This is aimed to prohibit anyone from making statements that challenge the integrity and sovereignty of India.Practical constraints and curtailments and, which enable an individual to participate in public activities. The phrase, ' has not been used in Article 19, though freedom activists, as well as most scholars and industrialised jurisdictions throughout the world recognise that freedom of expression includes freedom of press. Reasonable restrictions can be imposed in the interest of public order, security of State, decency or morality.According to the estimates of, India ranks 138th worldwide in press freedom index (press freedom index for India is 43.24 for 2018). The, while not mentioning the word 'press', provides for 'the right to freedom of speech and expression' (Article 19(1) a). However this right is subject to restrictions under subclause (2), whereby this freedom can be restricted for reasons of ' and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, preserving decency, preserving morality, in relation to contempt of court, or incitement to an offence'.
Laws such as the and (POTA) have been used to limit press freedom. Under POTA, person could be for up to six months before the police were required to bring charges on allegations for terrorism-related offences. POTA was repealed in 2004, but was replaced by amendments to UAPA.
The Official Secrets Act 1923 remains in effect.For the first half-century of independence, media control by the state was the major constraint on press freedom. Famously stated in 1975 that is 'a Government organ, it is going to remain a Government organ.'
On 26 June 1975, the day after the so-called emergency was declared in violation of the natural rights of Indian citizens, the edition of in its obituary column carried an entry that read 'D.E.M O'Cracy beloved husband of T.Ruth, father of L.I.Bertie, brother of Faith, Hope and Justica expired on 26 June'.With the liberalisation starting in the 1990s, private control of media has increased, leading to increasing independence and greater scrutiny of government.Organisations like and have been particularly influential, e.g. In bringing about the resignation of powerful minister. In addition, laws like act passed in recent years contribute significantly to reducing the control of the press by the government. In recent times, the Indian government has been accused of trying to curtail this freedom through various means. Sedition According to the English Law, sedition embraces all the practices whether by word or writing which are calculated to disturb the tranquillity of the State and lead an ignorant person to subvert the Government. Basic criticism of the government is not seen as sedition unless the Government believes that it was calculated to undermine the respect for the government in such a way so as to make people cease to obey it.
Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code defines the offence of sedition as follows: 'Sedition. Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Government established by law in India, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine'. But Explanation 3 says 'Comments expressing disapprobation of the administrative or other action of the Government without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section'. In Kedar Nath v.
State of Bihar (AIR 1962 SC 955), the court upheld the constitutional validity of the Section 124A of I.P.C and also upheld the view taken in Niharendu’s case.Bibliography., Freedom of Speech and Offence: Why Blasphemy Laws Are not the Appropriate Response, (18 June 2006), www.google.com (as a pdf). Chopra, Chandmal, and Sita Ram Goel. The Calcutta Quran Petition. New Delhi: Voice of India. Cohen, Henry, C.R.S.
Report for Congress: Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment, (27 August 2003), www.google.com ( as a pdf ). Elst, Koenraad. Negationism in India: concealing the record of Islam. Liang, Lawrence, Reasonable Restrictions and Unreasonable Speech, (2004), www.google.com ( as a pdf ). Pandey, J. N., Constitutional Law of India, 42nd ed.
(2005), Central Law Agency, Allahabad. Singh, M. P., Constitution of India, 10th ed.
Constitutional Law Of India Dr. J.n. Pandey Central Law Agency Pdf
(2001), Eastern Book Co., Lko. Arun Shourie, Ram Swarup, and Goel, Sita Ram. Freedom of expression: secular theocracy versus liberal democracy. Tiwari, Dr. Mahendra, Freedom of press in India: Constitutional Perspectives, (2006), www.supremecourtcases.com. Rajak, Brajesh, Pornography Law; XXX Must not be Tolerated, (2011) Universal Law Publishing Co. New Delhi.See also.
^ Elst, Koenraad. In Favour of Freedom of Expression: Section 295A as Cornerstone of Censorship. Journal of the American Institute of Religion, Dialogue, Vol. Retrieved 30 September 2016.
Sraddhananda (1 January 1926). Delhi: Shraddhananda. Adcock, C.S. Journal of the American Academy of Religion. Retrieved 20 March 2018. AIR 1978 SC 597.
Constitutional Law Of India By J N Pandey Pdf Free
AIR 1914 PC 116, 117. ^, AIR 1950 SC 124., (2002) 5 SCC 294., (1985) 1 SCC 641., AIR 1959 SC 395., AIR 1962 SC 305.
AIR 1973 SC 106; (1972) 2 SCC 788., AIR 1957 SC 896; Express Newspapers v. Union of India, AIR 1958SC 578, 617., (1986) 3 SCC 615., AIR 1952 SC 329. Om Prakash v. Emperor, AIR 1948 Nag, 199.
Raj Bahadur Gond v. State of Hyderabad, AIR 1953 Hyd 277.
Constitutional Law Of India By J N Pandey Pdf 2017
Ramjilal Modi v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1957 SC 622; 1957 SCR 860., AIR 1961 SC 884. LR 3 QB 360. Eurasia Review. 13 August 2017. Retrieved 2 September 2017. Kalhan, Anil; et al.
'Colonial Continuities: Human Rights, Antiterrorism, and Security Laws in India'. Cite journal requires journal=. PUCL Bulletin.
Constitutional Law Of India By J N Pandey Pdf Writer Free
People's Union for Civil Liberties. Archived from on 11 April 2018. Retrieved 5 February 2008.
Roy, Barun (1 September 2009). Pustak Mahal. Austin, Granville (1999). Oxford University Press. P. 295. Prabhu, Maya.
Constitutional Law Of India By Jn Pandey Pdf Free Download
Retrieved 25 October 2017. Jaising, Indira. Retrieved 25 October 2017. R. Salliven, (1868) 11 Cox Cases 55.
Niharendra v. Emperor, AIR 1942 FC 22. Section 124A of the Code.